8 Peec AI alternatives, including one built for apps
The best Peec AI alternatives depend on what you need to track. gaintage is #1 for apps, connectors and MCP servers that must rank inside ChatGPT, Claude, Muse and MCP registries. Profound is the enterprise pick for website brands, and Otterly.AI is the low-cost tracker. Engine add-ons are one reason to switch: third-party lists say the base plan includes 3 engines and each extra engine costs more.
gaintage wrote this list, and we compete with some of the tools on it.
- You sell an app listed in an AI app store → gaintage
- You run a large website brand → Profound
- You want the lowest price → Otterly.AI
Peec AI gives marketing teams AI search analytics across multiple engines.
Peec AI gives marketing teams AI search analytics: brand mentions, sentiment and citations across AI answers, with a Looker Studio export. Every plan has unlimited seats, per Writesonic's review. Peec AI also publishes MCP use-case pages, and it raised a $21M Series A. For a website brand with a marketing team, it is a good tool.
Teams switch from Peec AI for three common reasons. Verify each of these on the vendor's page before deciding.
Extra engines cost about €70 a month each.
Third-party lists say extra engines cost about €70 a month each. Geoptie's FAQ also asks whether Peec AI tracks Claude.
Some reviews say Peec AI shows data but does not recommend changes.
Some reviews say Peec AI shows data but does not say what to change.
Peec AI tracks answers, not app store listings.
Peec AI tracks answers. It does not track plugin or connector rank in AI app stores.
Compare these six features when choosing a Peec AI alternative.
Engines at the tier you buy.
Check that the engines you need are in your plan, without add-ons.
Prompt volume and refresh frequency.
More prompts, run more often, give a truer picture of AI visibility.
Citations that show which pages the assistant read.
See which pages each assistant read before it answered.
Actions and fixes, not only reports.
The tool should list what to change next.
App store rank, if you sell an app.
A plugin or connector also needs its rank in the AI app stores.
A public price you can check before a sales call.
You should see the full price, add-ons included, before a sales call.
These Peec AI alternatives differ on price, engines and app store coverage.
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Engines included | Tracks AI app store rank | Seats |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gaintage | Apps, connectors and MCP servers | $29/month | ChatGPT, Claude, Muse, Meta AI | Yes | — |
| Profound | Enterprise website brands | $99/month | ChatGPT at entry | No | — |
| Otterly.AI | Low cost | $29/month | — | No | — |
| Scrunch | Agent experience, AI crawler data | — | — | No | — |
| AthenaHQ | GEO analytics | $295/month | — | No | — |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | Ahrefs users | $199/month | — | No | — |
| Semrush AI Toolkit | Semrush users | — | — | No | — |
| AppTweak AI Visibility | Mobile apps | — | ChatGPT, Gemini | No | — |
1.gaintage tracks apps in ChatGPT, Claude and MCP registries.
Best for: teams whose product is a ChatGPT plugin, Claude connector, Muse connector or MCP server.
Features: rank in the ChatGPT Plugin Directory, Claude's connector directory, Muse, Meta AI and MCP registries; chat keywords that show how often each assistant suggests you; competitors by prompt; listing fixes; an API and an MCP server for your own reports and workflows.
Price: Starter $29 a month, Growth $99 a month, Enterprise custom. All four assistants on every plan.
Limits: less depth on web citations than GEO tools. A newer brand.
Who should not pick it: a website brand with no app listing.
If you sell an app, read about AI visibility for apps.
Topics and intents TopicKeywordsVisibilityTop intentMeetings3174ActionDocs2869GenerativeWiki2252CommercialPlanning1941Commercial2.Profound serves enterprise website brands with agent and crawler analytics.
Best for: large brands with budget.
Features: AI visibility across answers, agent and crawler analytics, many integrations, a Claude connector.
Price: from $99 a month, which tracks ChatGPT only per third-party lists.
Limits: price jumps at the next tier.
Who should not pick it: small teams.
3.Otterly.AI monitors AI answers and citations at a low entry price.
Best for: small teams and agencies.
Features: brand mentions and citations in AI answers and Google AI Overviews, an API, a Looker Studio connector.
Price: from $29 a month.
Limits: small prompt counts at entry.
Who should not pick it: enterprise teams.
4.Scrunch tracks AI visibility and shows how crawlers read your site.
Best for: brands that want to see how AI crawlers and agents read their site.
Features: AI visibility tracking plus AI crawler data.
Limits: built for larger teams.
Who should not pick it: teams that only need mention counts.
5.AthenaHQ gives GEO analytics and content guidance.
Best for: content teams that want analytics and guidance.
Features: AI answer tracking and content suggestions.
Price: from $295 a month.
Limits: high entry price.
Who should not pick it: small budgets.
6.Ahrefs Brand Radar adds AI mentions to an existing Ahrefs subscription.
Best for: SEO teams already on Ahrefs.
Features: brand mentions in AI answers, including Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, next to SEO data.
Price: from $199 a month.
Limits: value depends on using Ahrefs.
Who should not pick it: teams outside Ahrefs.
7.Semrush AI Toolkit adds AI visibility reports inside Semrush.
Best for: SEO teams already on Semrush.
Features: AI visibility reports inside Semrush.
Limits: an add-on to a larger suite.
Who should not pick it: teams outside Semrush.
8.AppTweak AI Visibility measures whether ChatGPT and Gemini recommend a mobile app.
Best for: App Store and Google Play apps.
Features: whether ChatGPT and Gemini recommend your mobile app, with intents, sentiment and sources.
Limits: no rank inside AI app stores.
Who should not pick it: plugin and connector teams. Compare gaintage vs AppTweak.
Peec AI and Profound are the two most compared tools in this category.
| Peec AI | Profound | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Marketing teams | Enterprise brands |
| Entry price | ~€85/month | $99/month |
| Engines at entry | 3 of 6 | ChatGPT only |
| Seats | Unlimited | — |
| Agent analytics | — | Yes |
| AI app store rank | No | No |
Peec AI suits a marketing team that wants several engines at a lower price. Profound suits an enterprise that wants agent data and many integrations. Shortlisting more? See the best Profound alternatives for app teams.
Which Peec AI alternative fits your team?
You sell a plugin or connector listed in an AI app store.
gaintage.
Engine add-ons cost too much on your plan.
Otterly.AI.
You need enterprise-grade agent and crawler data.
Profound.
You want AI crawler data alongside visibility tracking.
Scrunch.
You already pay for an SEO suite and want AI data in it.
Ahrefs Brand Radar or Semrush AI Toolkit.
You sell a mobile app in the App Store or Google Play.
AppTweak AI Visibility.
Frequently asked questions.
Is Peec AI legit?
Yes. Peec AI is a real company that raised a $21M Series A and serves marketing teams.
What is Peec AI used for?
Marketing teams use it to track how AI answers mention their brand, with sentiment and citations.
Who are Peec AI's competitors?
Peec AI competitors include Profound, Otterly.AI, Scrunch, AthenaHQ, Ahrefs Brand Radar and Semrush. For apps in AI app stores, gaintage.
Does Peec AI track ChatGPT plugins?
No. Peec AI tracks answers, not plugin rank in the ChatGPT Plugin Directory. gaintage tracks both rank and chat suggestions for plugins.
Is Profound better than Peec AI?
For enterprise brands that want agent data and many integrations, Profound fits better. For marketing teams that want several engines at a lower entry price, Peec AI fits better.